The 5 Best Presidential Candidates to Address Climate Change
With all respect (and perhaps some thanks) to Mr. Gore, taking action on climate change is now a major political issue as well as a moral issue. This is particularly true for U.S. voters this year, who are trying to decide on their nation’s next president.
The successful presidential candidate will be responsible for leading his/her nation in reducing its carbon emissions, increasing its fuel efficiency standards, and developing its nascent clean energy industry. The president will also be charged with responding to parts of the country hit hard by climate change conditions, like droughts, fires, and storms.
Fortunately, voters won’t have to make their decision in the dark. The League of Conservation Voters (LCV), a non-partisan organization that describes itself as "the independent political voice for the environment," has compiled a reference chart to show voters where candidates stand on climate change.
The following are the top five presidential candidates of 2008, based on the issue of climate change. In order to assess how serious candidates truly are about the issue of global warming, they are organized below according to how well they scored out of 100 on an overall evaluation of their environmental policies, starting with the highest scorer. (And no, Steven Colbert didn’t make the list, no matter how much natural gas he provides.)
Barack Obama (96) supports:
- 80% reductions of CO2 production by 2050.
- 50 mpg fleet-wide automotive standard by 2025.
- 25% renewable electrical energy standard by 2025.
- 50% reduction in energy intensity by 2030.
- Investing in liquid coal if it reduces carbon pollution by 10%; will consider standards that ban new conventional coal plants.
Dennis Kucinich (92) supports:
- 80% reductions of CO2 production by 2050.
- 40 mpg automotive standards; supported 33 mpg automotive standard in 2005.
- 20% renewable electrical energy standard by 2010.
- General energy efficiency, although he has no target specified.
- [Has no articulated position on new coal plants and liquid coal.]
Hillary Clinton (90) supports:
- 80% reductions of CO2 production by 2050.
- 35 mpg fleet-wide automotive standard by 2017.
- 20% renewable electrical energy standard by 2020.
- 10% reduction in energy consumption by 2020.
- Investing in liquid coal if it reduces carbon pollution by 20%.
Joe Biden (84) supports:
- 80% reductions of CO2 production by 2050.
- 40 mpg fleet-wide automotive standard by 2017.
- 20% renewable electrical energy standard by 2020.
- 10% reduction in energy consumption by 2020.
- Rejecting investment in liquid coal.
Bill Richardson (82) supports:
- 80% reductions of CO2 production by 2050.
- 50 mpg fleet-wide automotive standard.
- 30% renewable electrical energy standard by 2020 and 50% by 2050.
- 20% increase in energy productivity.
- A ban on new coal plants unless they capture and store emissions; he opposes liquid coal.
Readers may note that all of the preceding five leaders on environmental stewardship are members of the Democratic Party. They will be competing against one another to win their party’s nomination over the course of the primary elections, which will run from January to September of 2008. Make sure to register to vote several weeks prior to your state’s primary elections in order to vote to nominate your choice of presidential candidate.
Readers who align more closely with the Republican Party may also be interested to know which Republican presidential candidates are offering solutions to climate change. Most ‘08 Republican candidates have as strong a record of opposing environmental protection legislation and/or have no stated positions about the country’s energy goals and issues related to climate change. However, some Republican candidates are looking to support legislation that would benefit the climate. John McCain and Mike Huckabee lead their party on legislative forsight to address climate change. Even still, Mr. McCain has opposed fuel efficiency legislation and neither candidate has a stated position on coal. The only other candidate from this party to offer some hint of beneficial legislative promises on climate change is Mitt Romney, although he opposes fuel efficiency standards "as a stand alone measure," has no position on renewable energy, and supports liquid coal.
For more information on the positions of the 2008 presidential candidates on the environment, the energy industry, and climate change, see the resources listed below or visit the LCV reference chart for presidential candidates on climate change.
References and Resources:
Where the Candidates Currently Stand | League of Conservation Voters, Heatison.org
’08: On The Record | League of Conservation Voters
Presidential Candidates weigh in on Energy Policy | Solarnation
The Candidates | League of Conservation Voters, Heatison.org
Mike Garofalo’s Blog on the presidential candidates | GO
Photo Source:
White House Back | US Government
Tags: '08, 2008, Activism, Alternative Fuels, candidates, Climate Change, Conservation, election, Politics, president, presidential candidates, vote, voting, voting+record

Are you a green music pirate? (ARRR!) Free music downloading has generated a lot of debate, with some artists for and others against it. Well, here’s a positive note for all you lyrical plunderers: downloading music is more environmentally friendly than buying it on CD. But you don’t have to be scurvy about it either: these days, it’s arguably much easier (and cheaper) to buy your music fair and square on iTunes than it is to buy CDs at the music shop. Besides, you’re more likely to find new musicians you like in the gigantic online music archives than in the cramped aisles of a music store.
Before reading this blog, go to
Eleanor Roosevelt once said, "do one thing every day that scares you." Until about a month ago, I felt—and I don’t think I’m alone here—that cold showers were pretty scary. I’ve since come to love the refreshing, energy-saving thrill of showering cold. Now, I know that you may never want to try this daring piece of everyday eco-activism. But in case you’re curious, here are the greatest thrills and chills of la douche froide.
What’s the connection between dinner parties and polar bears? No, we’re not suggesting that you serve bear. Cooking one large meal with a small group of friends is more energy efficient than cooking several individual meals in different houses. This reduces the greenhouse gasses responsible for Global Warming, a threat to arctic ecosystems.
